Florida authorities say a Kansas man posted 23 antisemitic death threats against Ben Shapiro and timed them to Yom Kippur, and a judge is holding him without bond.
Story Highlights
- Police say 23 threats on X named Ben Shapiro and tied a countdown to Yom Kippur.
- Prosecutors applied Florida’s hate-crime reclassification based on religious motive claims.
- Investigators say the suspect admitted posting from multiple social accounts during an August interview.
- The judge ordered no bond on 23 felony counts of written or electronic threats.
Arrest And Charges In A Multi-State Threat Case
Palm Beach County deputies arrested Korby Allen Strube, 29, of Horton, Kansas, on 23 counts of making written or electronic threats to kill or cause bodily harm. Court records cited by local outlets say investigators found probable cause for each count. Reports identify the threats as posts on the social platform X made between July 31 and August 2. A Palm Beach County judge ordered Strube held without bond after booking in the county jail on the Florida charges.
Investigators and reporters say the posts repeatedly named Ben Shapiro and included a countdown to Yom Kippur, a holy day in Judaism. The arrest materials described the messages as violent and antisemitic. The case charges focus on the Florida venue because Shapiro lives and works in Palm Beach County. Authorities say the timing and content connected the messages to a specific date and to Shapiro’s Jewish faith, which raised the stakes for prosecutors.
Hate-Crime Reclassification And Alleged Motive
Prosecutors in Palm Beach County moved to reclassify each count under Florida’s hate-crime law. They alleged that religion was a motivating factor behind the threats. That move can increase penalty exposure if a jury later finds the motive element. Reporting also says Shapiro told investigators he believed his religion motivated the threats. These points set the stage for a clear legal fight over motive and intent at any future hearings or trial.
Florida’s hate-crime reclassification sits on top of the base offense of written or electronic threats. The base offense targets messages that communicate a serious intent to kill or injure. United States Supreme Court cases say “true threats” are not protected by the First Amendment. Prosecutors must still prove the mental state needed under current law. Recent decisions require the state to show at least recklessness about the threatening nature of the speech.
Investigation Trail And The Role Of Federal Agents
Reports say investigators interviewed Strube at his Kansas home in August while looking into threats against several public figures. Local reports say United States Secret Service agents and Brown County authorities took part. Summaries of the affidavit say Strube admitted posting from three social media accounts. Those statements helped link the accounts to a single person and supported the probable-cause findings reported by the outlets that reviewed the records.
Coverage also mentions threats toward other figures, including President Trump, the Obamas, and others, during that broader review. The Florida case, however, centers on the posts naming Shapiro and on venue in Palm Beach County. The charges filed there reflect that focus. The reporting does not describe evidence of travel plans, weapons, or coordination. The known record so far rests on the content, timing, and authorship of the online messages.
Public Safety Concerns, Free Speech Lines, And What Comes Next
Law enforcement treats threats against public figures as urgent, even when posted online. Security teams must weigh intent, timing, and target details. In this case, the countdown to a holy day and the religious references raised alarms for officials and for the named target. A no-bond order signals a court view that the allegations pose a serious risk. The next steps will likely include defense counsel appointments, arraignment, and discovery on the social media records.
Gee, I wonder if he is a Candace Owens fan. 🧐
Probable cause affidavit for the arrest of Korby A. Strube obtained from Clerk of the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, states that Strube made numerous threats against Ben Shapiro and President Trump “and others…”
He apparently… pic.twitter.com/TcbNLICeWr
— Ally (@AllyJKiss) September 16, 2026
Recent Supreme Court rulings frame the legal test jurors may hear. Judges will instruct that true threats fall outside free speech. But the state must prove the defendant at least understood a serious risk that his words would be taken as threats. That line tries to protect heated speech while punishing real menace. How the posts read in full, how they were received, and what the suspect knew will matter if the case goes to trial.
Sources:
abc3340.com, wpbf.com, ground.news, podcasts.apple.com, queensjewishlink.com, populartimelines.com, veropatriot.iheart.com
© libertysociety.com 2026. All rights reserved.














