(LibertySociety.com) – A jury ruled Starbucks negligent in handling beverages, leading to a $50 million compensation for a victim of severe burns. How did this significant decision come about?
At a Glance
- Michael Garcia wins $50 million after being burned by Starbucks hot tea.
- The February 2020 incident involved a venti-sized tea spilling in a drive-through.
- Garcia’s injuries required skin grafts and resulted in permanent disfigurement.
- Starbucks plans to appeal the decision, citing disagreement with the fault finding.
California Court Ruling
A California jury awarded Michael Garcia, a delivery driver, $50 million following a devastating incident involving hot tea from Starbucks. The jury found Starbucks negligent, citing that the hot beverage was not adequately secured in a takeout tray, leading to serious burns for Garcia.
On February 8, 2020, Garcia endured severe burns when a Starbucks employee failed to properly secure a venti-sized tea. This resulted in a spill in Garcia’s lap at a drive-through. The injuries were so critical that they required multiple skin grafts and other medical interventions, causing permanent disfigurement that significantly altered his life.
Starbucks’ Response
Following the jury’s decision, Starbucks expressed disagreement with the fault finding. The company plans to appeal the ruling, arguing that the damages awarded were excessive. Starbucks continues to emphasize its dedication to stringent safety standards in its operations, particularly regarding the handling of hot beverages.
“We have always been committed to the highest safety standards in our stores, including the handling of hot drinks.” – Starbucks spokesperson.
Garcia’s attorney, Nick Rowley, emphasized the impact of the verdict. “This jury verdict is a critical step in holding Starbucks accountable for flagrant disregard for customer safety and failure to accept responsibility.” This case sets a precedent for customer safety across the industry, reinforcing the importance of proper beverage handling protocols.
Historical Context
This case is reminiscent of the well-known McDonald’s coffee lawsuit from the 1990s, where another hot beverage incident led to a substantial jury award. Such cases continue to ignite debates on corporate responsibility and consumer safety in the food and beverage sector.
“We disagree with the jury’s decision that we were at fault for this incident and believe the damages awarded to be excessive.” – Starbucks.
Starbucks’ legal challenges in this and similar past lawsuits highlight the ongoing issue of ensuring customer safety and maintaining rigorous standards, addressing both public concern and corporate accountability.
Copyright 2025, LibertySociety.com
