(LibertySociety.com) – The UK-based newsmagazine The Economist recently sparked a wave of reactions with its latest cover, projecting former President Trump as the “greatest threat to the world” in the upcoming year. The cover was released by Dylan Byers, senior correspondent at Puck, revealing an intriguing depiction of the Earth shrouded by the former president’s silhouette.
The related article, part of their upcoming November issue, explicitly warns about the potential risks of Trump’s possible second term. With a headline that reads, “Donald Trump poses the greatest threat to the world in 2024,” the piece delivers an ominous forecast of what a Trump victory could mean.
The piece states, “A specter is haunting the Earth. This week, we are introducing The World Ahead 2024, our 38th annual forecast for the next year, and never before has an individual dominated our projections as much as Donald Trump does for 2024. The realization that Trump could retake the helm next November is beginning to set in.”
The article highlights Trump’s impressive polling numbers, showing him leading President Biden in several pivotal states. It underscores the shifting dynamics within the Democratic base, as a significant number of Black and Latino voters are reportedly distancing themselves from the party.
The Economist warns of the potential pitfalls of Trump’s return: “This is a precarious moment for someone like Mr. Trump to be on the brink of reentering the Oval Office. Democracy is on shaky ground domestically. Mr. Trump’s insistence that he won the 2020 election was more than a mere falsehood: it was a calculated gamble that he could sway and bully his fellow citizens, and it has paid off.”
The conclusion emphasizes, “A second Trump term would mark a turning point unlike the first. Victory would validate his most destructive perceptions about wielding power. His initiatives would face fewer obstacles. And because America would knowingly elect him despite his past actions, its moral influence would diminish.”
The cover and the article have attracted criticism from the public, with many arguing it reveals the mainstream media’s potential “unbridled panic” over the possibility of Trump’s 2024 campaign.
Several online commentators have expressed their views. Auron MacIntyre, host at The Blaze, wrote on X, previously known as Twitter, “If you thought the media was irresponsible in 2020 and 2022 just wait till 2024.”
The Daily Wire editor, Brent Scher, criticized the publication for overlooking international threats in their Trump-centric coverage. National Review senior writer Dan McLaughlin used the opportunity to critique President Biden, saying, “This is another way of saying that the current president of the United States is too small to meet the moment.”
Meanwhile, Citizens for Renewing America executive director Wade Miller dismissed The Economist as an “unserious publication.”
Copyright 2023, LibertySociety.com