
(LibertySociety.com) – The battle over permanent daylight saving time ensues, challenging health and business paradigms.
At a Glance
- Bipartisan group led by Sen. Rick Scott reintroduces the Sunshine Protection Act for permanent daylight saving time.
- Supporters argue for economic growth and lifestyle benefits, while opponents cite health risks.
- Sleep experts recommend standard time to align with natural circadian rhythms for better health and safety.
- The Senate passed the bill previously, but it stalled in the House.
Sunshine Protection Act Proposal
Sen. Rick Scott and a bipartisan group have advocated for the Sunshine Protection Act, aiming to make daylight saving time permanent. This legislation promises longer daylight in the evenings year-round, thus nullifying the need for clock changes. This proposal garners support from senators like Patty Murray and Tommy Tuberville, highlighting the transition’s potential for evening outdoor activities, energy efficiency, and economic benefits.
The Senate unanimously approved the bill in the past, yet faces resistance in the House. Rep. Greg Steube leads the House version, expecting further discussions. Supporters emphasize the modernization of this century-old practice.
It's time we stop changing the clocks.
I reintroduced my bipartisan bill with @SenRickScott to make Daylight Saving Time permanent so we have more sunlight during the most productive hours of the day. This is good for families in WA state & across the country!
— Senator Patty Murray (@PattyMurray) January 8, 2025
Health Implications and Opposing Views
Health professionals, notably the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, argue against permanent daylight saving time, citing adverse health outcomes including increased stroke risk and traffic accidents. They promote standard time as it better synchronizes with humans’ natural circadian sleep-wake cycles. Dr. M. Adeel Rishi emphasized the pivotal role of morning daylight for maintaining biological rhythms.
“Permanent, year-round standard time is the best choice to most closely match our circadian sleep-wake cycle. Daylight saving time results in more darkness in the morning and more light in the evening, disrupting the body’s natural rhythm.” – Dr. M. Adeel Rishi
Research points to potential daylight saving time benefits like reduced crime due to increased evening light, but experts argue these are overshadowed by health risks. The AASM also warns of the mental disturbances caused by shifting clocks twice annually.
Permanent Daylight Time time failed twice before @SenMarcoRubio @SenMarkey Don’t waste tax payer dollars trying it again. Instead Lock the Clock with Sun-Aligned Permanent Standard Time to naturally improve health and well being https://t.co/IL8VKDwwzW
— Karin Johnson (@drsleepykarin) November 4, 2024
Economic and Business Considerations
The economic angle of the daylight saving time debate is significant. The golf industry advocates for the change, anticipating enhanced participation with extended daylight. Proponents highlight economic growth and more leisure opportunities as major advantages of retaining daylight saving time throughout the year.
“The head-spinning ritual of falling back and springing forward has a very real impact on our economy, our health, and our happiness. Let’s say goodbye to 4pm winter sunsets and pass the Sunshine Protection Act for permanent Daylight Saving Time — permanently springing forward for brighter evenings year-round.” – Sen. Ed Markey
Despite the optimism, concerns over safety and broader implications echo in legislative halls, as figures like Sen. Roger Wicker vocalize issues tied to a permanent switch. The debate continues, underscoring the clash between modernization and traditional health perspectives.
Copyright 2025, LibertySociety.com